Compliance Checkpoints

Where obligations fire
in the payment lifecycle.

The big picture: Every stablecoin transaction passes through compliance gates — screening, monitoring, and filing obligations — mapped to the eight stages of the Stable straight-through processing (STP) model. Each checkpoint is classified by stage position, legal basis, and tooling.

Before Intent · Identity · Discovery
During Negotiation · Transport · Authorization · Facilitation
After Finality

Select a stage to explore

AGENTKYA AttestationKYC / KYB / KYASanctions ScreeningTravel RuleAML MonitoringCompliance Sign-offRegulatory ReportingAudit TrailIntentIdentityDiscoveryNegotiationTransportAuthorizationFacilitationFinalityIdentitySanctionsTravel RuleAMLAuthorizationReportingAudit

Intent

The Mandate Gate

Before

"Who holds the mandate to make this happen?"

Compliance Gates

Sanctions screening

Legal basis

OFAC SDN, EU consolidated list

Tools

Chainalysis, Elliptic, TRM Labs

PEP screening

Legal basis

AML/CFT directives, local PEP lists

Tools

ComplyAdvantage, Dow Jones

Checkpoint Density

Gates3
Monitors1
Obligations0

Compliance Tags

BOCDDEDD

FATF Recommendations

R.1Risk Assessment

Risk-based approach — assess ML/TF risk before onboarding

R.6Targeted Financial Sanctions

Screen against UN/national sanctions lists at first contact

Jurisdiction Examples

USOFAC Sanctions Programs

SDN list screening required before any transaction relationship

EUEU Sanctions Regulation

Consolidated list screening under Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002

Checkpoint Density

Where compliance obligations concentrate

Why it matters: Not all stages carry equal compliance weight. Identity and Facilitation are the most gate-heavy stages. Finality carries the most filing obligations. This chart shows the distribution of gates, monitors, and obligations across all eight stages.

12345IntentIdentityDiscoveryNegotiationTransportAuthorizationFacilitationFinalityGatesMonitorsObligations

AML / CFT Framework

The regulatory foundation

What it is: Compliance checkpoints derive from a layered regulatory architecture — global standards (FATF), national AML acts, and counter-financing of terrorism (CFT) obligations. Each layer maps to specific stages in the payment lifecycle.

FATF 40 Recommendations

The global standard for AML/CFT. Key recommendations map directly to STP stages: R.10 (CDD) → Identity, R.16 (Travel Rule) → Transport, R.20 (STR) → Finality. The June 2023 updated guidance explicitly covers virtual assets and VASPs.

R.1→Intent · R.10→Identity · R.16→Transport · R.20→Finality · R.29→Finality

Jurisdiction AML Acts

National implementations vary in scope and threshold. BSA (US) sets $5K SAR / $10K CTR thresholds. MLD6 (EU) harmonizes across 27 member states. POCA (UK) uses a consent-based regime. PSA (Singapore) regulates digital payment tokens under MAS.

BSA→US · MLD6→EU · POCA→UK · PSA→SG · AMLO→HK · JFSA→JP

CFT Framework

Counter-financing of terrorism obligations include UNSCR-mandated sanctions, OFAC designations, and EU restrictive measures. Freezing workflows fire at Authorization (real-time block) and Facilitation (settlement hold). Asset freeze functions are built into major stablecoin smart contracts.

Sanctions→Intent · Freezing→Authorization · STR filing→Finality

Stablecoin Typologies

Common ML/TF patterns: layering through DeFi protocols (detectable at Transport), chain-hopping via cross-chain bridges (Facilitation), nested service provider abuse (Identity), and rapid conversion (Finality). Jurisdiction-specific red flag indicators inform monitoring rules.

Nested services→Identity · DeFi layering→Transport · Chain-hopping→Facilitation

Methodology

How checkpoints are mapped

How it works: Each checkpoint is classified across three dimensions: stage position (where in the lifecycle), legal basis (the regulation requiring the check), and tooling (solutions used to satisfy the requirement).

Sources: Classification follows FATF guidance (40 Recommendations, June 2023 VA/VASP update), jurisdiction-specific AML/CFT acts, and issuer compliance documentation.

Go deeper: The Stable STP model provides the stage framework. See StableSTP.com for the full specification. For jurisdiction-specific detail, see the Travel Rule map and individual jurisdiction pages.